An Open Letter to Keith Olbermann

By |2017-05-19T19:40:24-04:00March 10th, 2010|Press Releases|

FOR RELEASE: March 10, 2010Mr. Keith Olbermann “Countdown With Keith Olbermann” MSNBC TV 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY  10112 Countdown@msnbc.com An Open Letter to Keith Olbermann:As members of The Media Institute’s First Amendment Advisory Council, we are writing to take strong issue with your “special comment” of January 21, 2010, in which you personally [...]

Comments Off on An Open Letter to Keith Olbermann

First Amendment Leaders Call On Keith Olbermann To Issue Public Apology for Slur of Floyd Abrams

By |2018-03-18T14:56:52-04:00March 10th, 2010|Press Releases|

FOR RELEASE: March 10, 2010 Contact: Richard T. Kaplar The Media Institute 703-243-5700 Arlington, Va., March 10, 2010 – A group of distinguished First Amendment attorneys and scholars is calling on MSNBC commentator Keith Olbermann to publicly apologize to preeminent First Amendment attorney Floyd Abrams, over Olbermann’s Jan. 21 attack likening Abrams to a [...]

Comments Off on First Amendment Leaders Call On Keith Olbermann To Issue Public Apology for Slur of Floyd Abrams

The Rebirth of Copyright As an Opt-In System?

By |2018-07-04T10:27:25-04:00March 10th, 2010|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Jim Gibson, University of Richmond School of Law March 10, 2010 For most of the history of Anglo-American copyright law, copyright was an opt-in system: Authors had to jump through certain regulatory hoops if they wanted to prevent others from copying their works without consent.  These threshold formalities included registering their works with a [...]

Comments Off on The Rebirth of Copyright As an Opt-In System?

“The sole right … shall return to the Authors”: Part II: Implementing Authors’ Recapture Rights Under the 1976 Copyright Act

By |2018-07-04T14:11:04-04:00February 26th, 2010|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Jane C. Ginsburg, Columbia University School of Law* February 26, 2010 In our previous column (Dec. 8, 2009) we addressed the history and policy of authors’ reversion rights in U.S. copyright law, as well as the general outlines of the 1976 Act provisions on terminations of grants of copyright.  In this column, we will [...]

Comments Off on “The sole right … shall return to the Authors”: Part II: Implementing Authors’ Recapture Rights Under the 1976 Copyright Act

Google Books: Finally, Fair Use

By |2018-07-04T10:44:08-04:00February 23rd, 2010|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof.  Doug Lichtman*, UCLA School of Law February 23, 2010 Last week, U.S. District Court Judge Denny Chin held a much-anticipated “fairness hearing” during which a chorus of interested parties spoke both for and against Google’s proposed settlement to its Book Search litigation.  My own view aligns closely to the view articulated there by the [...]

Comments Off on Google Books: Finally, Fair Use

File-Sharing Copyrighted Works Without Authorization: A Misguided Social Movement

By |2018-07-04T10:44:52-04:00February 17th, 2010|Intellectual Property Issues|

Peter S. Menell, Professor of Law, University of California-Berkeley School of Law February 17, 2010 A little more than a decade ago, Napster rocked the music industry by enabling anyone with a computer and an Internet connection to costlessly and virtually anonymously distribute files to millions of others.  As cyberculture journalist Joseph Menn observed at [...]

Comments Off on File-Sharing Copyrighted Works Without Authorization: A Misguided Social Movement

Moving Forward in Google Book Search

By |2018-06-05T11:23:55-04:00February 10th, 2010|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Randal C. Picker, The University of Chicago Law School February 10, 2010 On Feb. 4, the Department of Justice filed its second statement of interest in the pending Google Book Search (GBS) case.  We now have a full slate of second-round filings as we head toward the fairness hearing set for a New York [...]

Comments Off on Moving Forward in Google Book Search

Forcing Radio Broadcasters To Pay Royalties for Sound Recordings Would Impose Economic Burden, Reduce Diversity, New Issue Paper States

By |2018-03-18T14:55:52-04:00February 3rd, 2010|Press Releases|

FOR RELEASE: February 3, 2010Contact: Richard T. Kaplar The Media Institute 703-243-5700 Arlington, Va., Feb. 3, 2010 – A proposed compulsory-license scheme that would force radio broadcasters to pay royalties to musical artists and record labels would impose an undue economic burden on broadcasters already racked by the recession.  In addition, the plan would likely reduce [...]

Comments Off on Forcing Radio Broadcasters To Pay Royalties for Sound Recordings Would Impose Economic Burden, Reduce Diversity, New Issue Paper States

Monopoly for Me

By |2018-06-05T13:39:51-04:00February 2nd, 2010|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Stan Liebowitz, University of Texas at Dallas February 2, 2010 Keeping a monopoly on yourself? Economists are trained to examine individual markets in order to determine whether or not those markets are functioning in an “economically efficient” manner.  Economic efficiency, once achieved, requires that there be no way to increase the overall “surplus” – [...]

Comments Off on Monopoly for Me

Government Should Not Try To ‘Save’ Media With Funding or Tax Subsidies, Former FCC Commissioner Warns in New Speaking Freely Paper

By |2018-03-18T14:54:59-04:00January 20th, 2010|Press Releases|

FOR RELEASE: January 20, 2010 Contact: Richard T. Kaplar The Media Institute 703-243-5700   Arlington, Va., Jan. 20, 2010 – Government intervention aimed at “saving” journalism by funding or subsidizing media companies is a misguided idea that could imperil the future of independent American journalism, says economist and former FCC commissioner Harold Furchtgott-Roth. That idea [...]

Comments Off on Government Should Not Try To ‘Save’ Media With Funding or Tax Subsidies, Former FCC Commissioner Warns in New Speaking Freely Paper
Go to Top