Prof. Jim Gibson, University of Richmond School of Law July 13, 2010 In an earlier essay in this series, Randy Picker discussed the recent copyright decision in Viacom v. YouTube, and in particular the court’s ruling that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s “safe harbor” for remote storage applies to YouTube’s online video service. I agree [...]
FOR RELEASE: July 1, 2010 Contact: Richard T. Kaplar The Media Institute 703-243-5700 Arlington, Va., July 1, 2010 – Government can play an appropriate role in helping journalism prosper on the Internet – but it involves providing the underlying legal structure and preventing unfair competition, rather than offering subsidies or making media companies nonprofit. [...]
Prof. Randal C. Picker, The University of Chicago Law School June 24, 2010 Yesterday, a federal district court in New York granted YouTube’s motion for summary judgment in its long-running litigation with Viacom. Viacom and – separately – the English Premier League sued YouTube and Google alleging that they were liable for infringing works that [...]
Prof. Doug Lichtman, UCLA School of Law June 16, 2010 Section 109 of the Copyright Act states that the owner of a particular copy of a copyrighted work “is entitled, without the authority of the copyright owner, to sell or otherwise dispose of the possession of that copy.” This is the “first sale” doctrine, and, [...]
Peter S. Menell, Professor of Law Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology University of California at Berkeley School of Law June 11, 2010 Dear Steve: Congratulations on the iPad, yet another revolutionary product – perhaps Apple’s most transformative. In just a few months, the iPad has broken through the digital book reader barrier – [...]
Time To Review Online Giant’s Role, Says Respected Communications Attorney FOR RELEASE: June 8, 2010 Contact: Richard T. Kaplar The Media Institute 703-243-5700 Arlington, Va., June 8, 2010 – Much of the recent activity by the Federal Communications Commission, Congress, and other government agencies to solve the “crisis” over the future of journalism misses [...]
Prof. Jane C. Ginsburg, Columbia University School of Law June 2, 2010 Several of the IP Issues columns have addressed the Google Book Search controversy, principally from the perspective of the still-pending settlement agreement, which would regulate the online availability of digitized books (or portions of them) to U.S. Internet users. While the proposed settlement [...]
Prof. Randal C. Picker, The University of Chicago Law School May 24, 2010 I am working on a paper on the history of razors and blades (yes, I know that sounds obscure, even for an ivory tower sort; I’ll leave it to another day to try to persuade you that you should be fascinated, too). [...]
Prof. Jim Gibson, University of Richmond School of Law May 18, 2010 In my last IP Issues entry, I discussed the advantages of reinstating formalities as prerequisites to copyright protection. In this entry, I will suggest one way in which this reinstatement might take place. For most of modern copyright law’s existence, a work of [...]
FOR RELEASE: May 7, 2010 Contact: Richard T. Kaplar The Media Institute 703-243-5700 Arlington, Va., May 7, 2010 – In comments filed with the Federal Communications Commission today, The Media Institute urged the Commission to be mindful of the First Amendment as it considers ways to involve itself in the future of media. Following [...]