Media Institute Showcases ‘Freedom of Speech’ Original Art As Part of 2014 Free Speech Week Celebration

By |2018-03-18T20:47:45-04:00September 5th, 2014|Press Releases|

FOR RELEASE: Sept. 5, 2014 Contact: Richard T. Kaplar The Media Institute 703-243-5700 Arlington, Va., Sept. 5 – Adding to the vitality of this year’s Free Speech Week (FSW) will be a series of original artwork created by noted artist Everett Spruill, founder and director of The Everett Spruill Foundation for the Arts in [...]

Comments Off on Media Institute Showcases ‘Freedom of Speech’ Original Art As Part of 2014 Free Speech Week Celebration

U.S. Compliance With the International Right of Communication to the Public After Aereo: Who Is “the Public”?

By |2018-07-03T17:24:02-04:00August 21st, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Jane C. Ginsburg, Columbia University School of Law August 21, 2014 In ABC v. Aereo, a 6-to-3 majority (Breyer, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan) held that Aereo was “performing” the broadcast programming when the service captured the programming through the users’ individually assigned antennas, then digitized, momentarily stored in individualized copies, [...]

Comments Off on U.S. Compliance With the International Right of Communication to the Public After Aereo: Who Is “the Public”?

Fair Use Middle Ground

By |2018-07-04T10:39:34-04:00August 11th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Doug Lichtman, UCLA School of Law August 11, 2014 My colleagues and I have written a great deal about copyright law’s “fair use” doctrine on this site over the years.  We have disagreed about cases, and we have struggled with various aspects of the standard fair use test.  Through all of those discussions, however, [...]

Comments Off on Fair Use Middle Ground

Authors Guild v. HathiTrust: Fair Use Comes to Digital Book Repositories

By |2018-07-04T10:41:04-04:00August 6th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Randal C. Picker, University of Chicago Law School August 6, 2014 As the New York Times 2004 headline put it, “New Google Service May Strain Old Ties in Bookselling.”  Strain indeed.  Google announced its mass book digitization project, which it then called Google Print, at that year’s Frankfurt Book Fair.  Now almost 10 years [...]

Comments Off on Authors Guild v. HathiTrust: Fair Use Comes to Digital Book Repositories

2014 Free Speech Week Slated for Oct. 20 – 26

By |2018-03-18T20:48:22-04:00August 1st, 2014|Press Releases|

FOR RELEASE: August 1, 2014 Contact: Richard T. Kaplar The Media Institute 703-243-5700 Arlington, Va., August 1, 2014 – Free Speech Week (FSW) will be celebrated this fall from Monday, Oct. 20, through Sunday, Oct. 26, 2014, marking its tenth year as the nation’s premier celebration of freedom of speech. Media organizations, universities, schools, [...]

Comments Off on 2014 Free Speech Week Slated for Oct. 20 – 26

Narrow Win for Claimant Despite Delay

By |2018-07-03T17:23:32-04:00July 29th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Rodney A. Smolla, Duke University School of Law July 29, 2014 The Supreme Court in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.1 interpreted the ancient equitable doctrine of “laches” as applied to a copyright holder’s delay in enforcing remedies under the Copyright Act.  The laches doctrine operates to bar claims that might otherwise be brought when the [...]

Comments Off on Narrow Win for Claimant Despite Delay

Trademark Law and Consumer Centrality – Part I

By |2018-07-03T17:24:59-04:00July 22nd, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. James Gibson, University of Richmond School of Law July 22, 2014 The conventional wisdom provides two traditional justifications for trademark law.  The first is the “consumer protection” rationale.  If there were no trademark law, an unknown soft drink manufacturer could freely use Coca-Cola’s COKE trademark on its goods.  If it did so, consumers would [...]

Comments Off on Trademark Law and Consumer Centrality – Part I

Aereo Was Not Innovation

By |2018-05-02T17:33:30-04:00July 3rd, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Doug Lichtman, UCLA School of Law July 3, 2014 The Supreme Court has now spoken in Aereo, and my colleagues here and elsewhere are actively discussing the Court’s opinion and its implications.  I will join that conversation at some point down the road, but for now I want to take a slightly different approach [...]

Comments Off on Aereo Was Not Innovation

Aereo, Disruptive Technology, and Statutory Interpretation

By |2018-07-04T13:15:39-04:00June 27th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Peter S. Menell,* University of California at Berkeley School of Law, and Prof. David Nimmer,** UCLA School of Law June 27, 2014 The Aereo case presented two fundamental showdowns: one between the cable industry and a charismatic disruptive technology, and the other between textualists and jurists seeking to vindicate legislative intent.  Much of the [...]

Comments Off on Aereo, Disruptive Technology, and Statutory Interpretation

Go Ask Alice: What Can You Patent After Alice v. CLS Bank?

By |2018-05-02T17:34:07-04:00June 26th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|

Prof. Robert P. Merges, University of California at Berkeley School of Law June 26, 2014 Those of us who sweat in the clammy gymnasia of patent law have been waiting – with a mix of excitement, dread, and cynical disregard – for the Alice v. CLS Bank decision.  The idea was, when the Supreme Court [...]

Comments Off on Go Ask Alice: What Can You Patent After Alice v. CLS Bank?
Go to Top