Trademark Law and Consumer Centrality – Part I

Prof. James Gibson, University of Richmond School of Law July 22, 2014 The conventional wisdom provides two traditional justifications for trademark law.  The first is the “consumer protection” rationale.  If there were no trademark law, an unknown soft drink manufacturer could freely use Coca-Cola’s COKE trademark on its goods.  If it did so, consumers would [...]

By |2018-07-03T17:24:59-04:00July 22nd, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Trademark Law and Consumer Centrality – Part I

Aereo Was Not Innovation

Prof. Doug Lichtman, UCLA School of Law July 3, 2014 The Supreme Court has now spoken in Aereo, and my colleagues here and elsewhere are actively discussing the Court’s opinion and its implications.  I will join that conversation at some point down the road, but for now I want to take a slightly different approach [...]

By |2018-05-02T17:33:30-04:00July 3rd, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Aereo Was Not Innovation

Aereo, Disruptive Technology, and Statutory Interpretation

Prof. Peter S. Menell,* University of California at Berkeley School of Law, and Prof. David Nimmer,** UCLA School of Law June 27, 2014 The Aereo case presented two fundamental showdowns: one between the cable industry and a charismatic disruptive technology, and the other between textualists and jurists seeking to vindicate legislative intent.  Much of the [...]

By |2018-07-04T13:15:39-04:00June 27th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Aereo, Disruptive Technology, and Statutory Interpretation

Go Ask Alice: What Can You Patent After Alice v. CLS Bank?

Prof. Robert P. Merges, University of California at Berkeley School of Law June 26, 2014 Those of us who sweat in the clammy gymnasia of patent law have been waiting – with a mix of excitement, dread, and cynical disregard – for the Alice v. CLS Bank decision.  The idea was, when the Supreme Court [...]

By |2018-05-02T17:34:07-04:00June 26th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Go Ask Alice: What Can You Patent After Alice v. CLS Bank?

Supreme Court Gets the Picture in Aereo

Prof. Rodney A. Smolla, Duke University School of Law June 25, 2014 This IP Viewpoints article is filed as breaking news.  Only minutes ago the Supreme Court announced its much-anticipated ruling in ABC, Inc., v. Aereo, Inc., a copyright case that, as I have previously posted in these Viewpoints pages, places in play the American [...]

By |2018-05-02T17:34:22-04:00June 25th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Supreme Court Gets the Picture in Aereo

The Copyright Office’s Music Licensing Study

Prof. Peter S. Menell, Koret Professor of Law and Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, University of California at Berkeley School of Law June 4, 2014 As part of Congress’s comprehensive review of the U.S. Copyright Act, the Copyright Office announced a broad-ranging study of music licensing on March 17, 2014.  The Office solicited [...]

By |2018-05-02T19:25:26-04:00June 4th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on The Copyright Office’s Music Licensing Study

Fair Use for Free, or ‘Permitted but Paid’?

Prof. Jane C. Ginsburg, Columbia University School of Law May 12, 2014 [Note: The following is drawn from an article forthcoming in the Berkeley Technology Law Journal, in a symposium issue devoted to “The Next Great Copyright Act.”] The Supreme Court in Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417 (1984), fended [...]

By |2018-04-05T11:30:57-04:00May 12th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Fair Use for Free, or ‘Permitted but Paid’?

Much Ado About Copyright’s ‘Making Available’ Right

Prof. Peter S. Menell, Koret Professor of Law and Director, Berkeley Center for Law & Technology, University of California at Berkeley School of Law May 9, 2014 Following hearings before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property and the Internet on Jan. 14, 2014, Congress asked the Copyright Office to review and assess “the state [...]

By |2018-07-04T13:30:40-04:00May 9th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Much Ado About Copyright’s ‘Making Available’ Right

Injunctions and Standard Essential Patents

Prof. Randal C. Picker, University of Chicago Law School May 6, 2014 Historians will look back and try to identify the precise point of peak patents, meaning, the point at which patents achieved their maximum strength.  I am not sure exactly when that will be, but one has the sense that we might be at [...]

By |2018-05-02T17:40:26-04:00May 6th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Injunctions and Standard Essential Patents

Public Performance in the Cloud

Prof. Doug Lichtman, UCLA School of Law April 30, 2014 As copyright aficionados well know, the Aereo case raises what is widely perceived to be a thorny issue: If Aereo engages in public performance, wouldn’t that same logic imply that cloud storage providers like DropBox also engage in public performance?  Arguing at the Supreme Court [...]

By |2018-05-02T21:19:04-04:00April 30th, 2014|Intellectual Property Issues|Comments Off on Public Performance in the Cloud
Go to Top