DONATE
>>Supreme Court Says Minnesota Ban on Political Apparel in Polling Places Too Broad

Supreme Court Says Minnesota Ban on Political Apparel in Polling Places Too Broad

By Robert Barnes, washingtonpost.com, 6-14-18

The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down Minnesota’s ban on wearing “political” apparel to polling places, saying that the state’s intentions may be good but that its law was too broad and open to differing interpretations.

The 7-to-2 decision, written by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., was careful not to cast constitutional doubt on restrictions every state imposes to protect the solemnity of the voting booth.

But Minnesota’s prohibition on the wearing of a “political badge, political button or other political insignia” raised more questions than it answered, Roberts wrote, and gave too much discretion to volunteer election judges trying to figure out what counted as “political” and what did not.

“The state must be able to articulate some sensible basis for distinguishing what may come in from what must stay out,” Roberts wrote.  “Here, the unmoored use of the term ‘political’ in the Minnesota law, combined with haphazard interpretations the state has provided in official guidance and representations to this court, cause Minnesota’s restriction to fail even this forgiving test.”  » Read More

By |2018-06-26T15:12:17+00:00June 15th, 2018|Issue Watch|Comments Off on Supreme Court Says Minnesota Ban on Political Apparel in Polling Places Too Broad