|
Broadcasting |
Cable TV |
Commercial Speech |
Common Carriers and Electronic
Publishers |
Newspapers, Magazines and Books | Satellite Remote Sensing | Cyberspace |
| NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZZINES, AND BOOKS |
Filed an amicus brief in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, joined by the Association of American Publishers, the Radio- Television News Directors Association, and The Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, asking the court to deny the FDA's motion to dismiss. The Media Institute argued that a First Amendment exception to the ripeness and exhaustion doctrines permits the court to review the FDA's prohibition of the distribution by pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers of independently generated medical textbooks and supplements, and peer-reviewed journal articles. [1994] The Court denied FDA's motion to dismiss on First Amendment grounds. [1995]
Filed comments before the Food and Drug Administration arguing the agency's required 'preclearance' of video news releases is an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech. The comments also requested that the FDA remove its restriction on drug manufacturers' dissemination of medical textbooks and peer-reviewed articles. [1994]
Filed comments with the circuit court asserting that the Cook County prosecutor was in violation of the First Amendment and the Illinois shield law by subpoenaing JAMA for the name of an anonymous doctor who wrote a controversial piece in JAMA on euthanasia. The Court granted JAMA's motion to quash the subpoena on statutory, not constitutional, grounds. [1988]
Filed a brief before the Supreme Court with several other media groups, organized by the Reporters Committee, about whether a reporter could be prosecuted under federal securities law for trading on alleged 'insider' information gathered for news purposes. Winans's conviction was upheld by the Supreme Court. [1986]
Filed a brief before the Supreme Court with several other media organizations, organized by the Reporters Committee, arguing that the SEC could not constitutionally require a publisher to register with the Commission in order to publish financial newsletters containing recommendations or reports concerning securities. [1984] The Court held for the publisher on statutory grounds without reaching the constitutional question. [1985] |